A growing inequality exists between the smaller bowl games that will begin on Saturday and the games that will be played in January. Here are a few examples:
- Potato Bowl (formerly the Humanitarian Bowl) - Generates revenue of less than $2 Million. Team payouts for game participation are $500,000 combined. Broadcast revenue is less than $200,000.
- New Orleans Bowl - Generates revenue of approximately $2 Million. Team payouts for game participation are $650,000 combined, and broadcast revenue is a little over $100,000.
- Holiday Bowl and Poinsettia Bowl - The same association puts on both bowl games which generated a combined $10.7 Million of revenue last year. Team Payouts were a combined $4.2 Million, or more than the combined revenue of the bowl games in Boise and New Orleans. Broadcast revenue in San Diego was $1.8 Million last year. Finally, this association currently hold approximately $4.7 Million of cash!
- The non-profit committees that put on the Orange Bowl and the Sugar Bowl hold approximately $20 Million and $21 Million respectively of publicly traded investments!
- "The Granddaddy of Them All" (aka The Rose Bowl) generated revenue last year of $54 Million. The participation payouts amounted to just under $18 Million per team. I know, they have a parade and do other things as well. Ok, so they only attributed $46 Million of their revenue to the Rose Bowl. However, the BCS National Championship Game was worth $54 Million of revenue (on top of the $43.7 Million generated by the Rose Bowl the same year) for the organization. That year, payouts to the four schools (Rose Bowl and BCS Championship) topped $70 Million!
Please correct me where I am wrong, but I just don't see how college football can maximize revenue through a playoff system.
No comments:
Post a Comment